Centralization of adrenal surgeries and improved surgeon volume outcomes
Editorial Commentary

Centralization of adrenal surgeries and improved surgeon volume outcomes

Diluka Pinto1, Titus Cvasciuc2, Rajeev Parameswaran3,4,5 ORCID logo

1Division of Endocrine Surgery, Ragama Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka; 2Division of Endocrine Surgery, Victoria Royal Hospital Belfast, Belfast, UK; 3Division of Endocrine Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; 4Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore; 5NUS Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence to: Asst Prof. Rajeev Parameswaran, FRCS. Senior Consultant of Division of Endocrine Surgery, National University Hospital, Level 8, Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore; NUS Centre for Cancer Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. Email: surrp@nus.edu.sg.

Comment on: Rajan S, Patel N, Stechman M, et al. Impact of adrenal surgeon volume on outcome: analysis of 4464 operations from the United Kingdom Registry of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery (UKRETS). Br J Surg 2024;111:znae002.


Keywords: Adrenalectomy; outcomes; centralization


Submitted May 30, 2024. Accepted for publication Aug 16, 2024. Published online Sep 19, 2024.

doi: 10.21037/gs-24-201


The incidence of adrenal surgeries continues to rise worldwide due to increasing use of imaging techniques, and detection of subclinical functional adrenal tumours. Adrenalectomies are complex procedures with the potential for increased peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Majority of adrenal surgeries are performed using minimally invasive techniques either via anterior or posterior approach depending on the size of tumours, bilaterality, nature of disease and patient factors. Shorter hospital stays, reduced postoperative pain, early return to work and routine activities, reduced complications and lower costs are the main advantages of a laparoscopic/retroperitoneoscopic surgical approach (1,2). However open adrenalectomy is the preferred choice in adrenocortical malignancies or very large adrenal tumours in order to maintain safe and oncological principles (3).

A lot of previous published studies focused on surgical volume/outcome relationships since the first introduction of the topic by Luft et al. in 1979 (4). Subsequently over the years improved outcomes have been correlated when surgeries performed by high-volume surgeons in high-volume hospitals such as aortic and vascular procedures, surgery for colorectal, pancreatic and esophagogastric cancers, and thyroidectomy (5,6). Findings from these studies prompted the drive for “centralization” of services for complex high-risk procedures in the UK, US and a few other countries (7). In relation to adrenal surgery, guidelines pertaining to the optimal management of adrenal conditions recommend that adrenalectomy should only be performed by high-volume surgeons and centralized at high-volume centers (8-10).

How can a high-volume adrenal surgeon be best described? The definition of high-volume adrenal surgeon varies between countries, ranging on an average of over 4 to 7 adrenalectomies per year. Anderson et al. in a study of 6,712 adrenalectomies (performed over a period of 11 years) found the optimal volume threshold of 6 cases per year for a surgeon to perform in order to have low postoperative complication rates, shorter hospital stay and better financial costs (11). However, a large number of adrenal surgeries tend to be performed by low volume surgeons, with some performing only up to one case per year, which is not ideal (11,12). As regards adrenocortical carcinoma, the data on outcomes and surgeon volume is less abundant, with one study showing a lower recurrence rate and improved outcomes in a high-volume centre (13), whereas another study showed no difference between high- and low-volume centre on outcomes (14).

Majority of studies reporting on surgeon volume outcomes in adrenal surgery were very heterogeneous. The studies did not show outcomes relating to approaches (anterior versus posterior), and were not tailored to specific patient populations and tumours that require a definitive multidisciplinary input such as pheochromocytoma (15). In a recent study published in the Br J Surg by Rajan et al. the authors showed that the incidence of postoperative complications appeared to be significantly lower when the threshold was above 12 operations per year (P=0.034) and 20 per year (P<0.001), but not six per year (P=0.540) (16). Nearly half of the surgeries undertaken by the surgeons were for adrenal carcinoma (6.2%), adrenal metastasis (8.1%) and phaeochromocytoma in (30.8%), which require a multidisciplinary approach, and therefore emphasizes the fact that such cases be best undertaken by high-volume surgeons or centres. The study also reported lower outcomes for bilateral surgery with a posterior approach. The authors of the study questioned the rationale of restricting surgery for pheochromocytoma to high-volume surgeons as was found not to be an independent risk factor for complications or death. If one were to consider this argument to be valid, then a significant number of adrenalectomies, especially pheochromocytomas might end up being done by low volume surgeons, which may be associated with adverse outcomes.

Evaluating volume outcomes in adrenal surgery can be challenging as the procedure may be performed by general surgeons, urologists and endocrine surgeons. The proceduralist of choice for adrenal pathologies varies with countries, with endocrine surgeons performing most of the cases in the UK whereas in the US it is the urologist (16,17). However, studies have showed no difference in volume outcomes based on the specialists performing adrenal surgeries (17). There is also a difference in benign adrenal pathologies between Asia and the West, with a higher rate of Conn’s in the East and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma in the west (18). Besides the difference in pathologies seen, data pertaining to volume-based outcomes is lacking in the many countries outside of Europe and US, especially from the developing and low-income countries.

Centralization of adrenal procedures to a hospital with an established multidisciplinary team seems to be the best way forward to reduced complication rates, deaths and avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. The number of cases recommended to be done per year by a surgeon performing adrenal surgery is increasing as new studies are being published and it looks this will be the trend in the upcoming years. It is difficult to apply these recommendations in countries outside of Europe and US as medical systems are different and volume-based outcome data is lacking currently.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Gland Surgery. The article has undergone external peer review.

Peer Review File: Available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-24-201/prf

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-24-201/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Lairmore TC, Folek J, Govednik CM, et al. Improving Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy: Selection of Optimal Approach and Comparison of Outcomes. World J Surg 2016;40:1625-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Sforza S, Minervini A, Tellini R, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a large international multicenter experience. Surg Endosc 2021;35:1801-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Yip L, Duh QY, Wachtel H, et al. American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for Adrenalectomy: Executive Summary. JAMA Surg 2022;157:870-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 1979;301:1364-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Morche J, Mathes T, Pieper D. Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:204. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Hoshijima H, Wajima Z, Nagasaka H, et al. Association of hospital and surgeon volume with mortality following major surgical procedures: Meta-analysis of meta-analyses of observational studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e17712. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Vonlanthen R, Lodge P, Barkun JS, et al. Toward a Consensus on Centralization in Surgery. Ann Surg 2018;268:712-24. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Fassnacht M, Dekkers OM, Else T, et al. European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma in adults, in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur J Endocrinol 2018;179:G1-G46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Palazzo F, Dickinson A, Phillips B, et al. Adrenal Surgery Practice Guidance for the UK. London, UK: British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons; 2016.
  10. Giordano A, Alemanno G, Bergamini C, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for giant adrenal tumours: Technical considerations and surgical outcome. J Minim Access Surg 2021;17:76-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Anderson KL Jr, Thomas SM, Adam MA, et al. Each procedure matters: threshold for surgeon volume to minimize complications and decrease cost associated with adrenalectomy. Surgery 2018;163:157-64. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Palazzo F, Dickinson A, Phillips B, et al. Adrenal surgery in England: better outcomes in high-volume practices. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2016;85:17-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, Boniardi M, et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma: effect of hospital volume on patient outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012;397:201-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Gratian L, Pura J, Dinan M, et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma associated with hospital case volume in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:3509-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Kazaure HS, Sosa JA. Volume-outcome relationship in adrenal surgery: A review of existing literature. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019;33:101296. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Rajan S, Patel N, Stechman M, et al. Impact of adrenal surgeon volume on outcome: analysis of 4464 operations from the United Kingdom Registry of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery (UKRETS). Br J Surg 2024;111:znae002. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Faiena I, Tabakin A, Leow J, et al. Adrenalectomy for benign and malignant disease: utilization and outcomes by surgeon specialty and surgical approach from 2003-2013. Can J Urol 2017;24:8990-7. [PubMed]
  18. Durand C, Vasciuc TC, Tai CH, et al. HypertensionCure and Reducing Pill Burden after Adrenalectomy for EndocrineHypertension of Adrenal Origin: A Comparative Study from an Asianand UK Cohort. World J Endoc Surg 2021;13:9-15. [Crossref]
Cite this article as: Pinto D, Cvasciuc T, Parameswaran R. Centralization of adrenal surgeries and improved surgeon volume outcomes. Gland Surg 2024;13(9):1662-1664. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-201

Download Citation