@article{GS6029,
author = {Victorien M.T. van Verschuer and Marike C. Maijers and Carolien H.M. van Deurzen and Linetta B. Koppert},
title = {Oncological safety of prophylactic breast surgery: skin-sparing and nipple-sparing versus total mastectomy},
journal = {Gland Surgery},
volume = {4},
number = {6},
year = {2015},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Women with a BRCA1/2 gene mutation and others with a high breast cancer risk may opt for bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. To allow for immediate breast reconstruction the skin envelope is left in situ with or without the nipple-areola complex (NAC). Although possibly leading to a more natural aesthetic outcome than the conventional total mastectomy, so-called skin-sparing mastectomies (SSM) and nipple-sparing mastectomies (NSM) may leave some breast glandular tissue in situ. The oncological risk associated with remaining breast glandular tissue is unclear. We present a case of primary breast cancer after prophylactic mastectomy followed by a review of the literature on remaining breast glandular tissue after various mastectomy techniques and oncological safety of prophylactic mastectomies.},
issn = {2227-8575}, url = {https://gs.amegroups.org/article/view/6029}
}